24. Blur's best chart position in America. What a time to be alive.

Moderators: tom_cas1, Caitlin, MrMagpie
Agreed. I'm very afraid but expecting that they look at those numbers (~15000 TOTAL sales) and think "our first proper gig in 15 years (not counting Coachella in 2013 which was a festival) which was hyped up and had limited access, and that's all we sold?" Can't see that making them want to slog around the country playing venues the same size as the one in Brooklyn, unless they just stick to the major markets like New York, Boston, Philly, DC, LA, San Fran, Chicago, Houston. Otherwise, what's the point?Sushi wrote:Man....
24. Blur's best chart position in America. What a time to be alive.I assume it is not enough of an indicator that gigs would do well here. *sigh*
Houston??MrMagpie wrote:Agreed. I'm very afraid but expecting that they look at those numbers (~15000 TOTAL sales) and think "our first proper gig in 15 years (not counting Coachella in 2013 which was a festival) which was hyped up and had limited access, and that's all we sold?" Can't see that making them want to slog around the country playing venues the same size as the one in Brooklyn, unless they just stick to the major markets like New York, Boston, Philly, DC, LA, San Fran, Chicago, Houston. Otherwise, what's the point?Sushi wrote:Man....
24. Blur's best chart position in America. What a time to be alive.I assume it is not enough of an indicator that gigs would do well here. *sigh*
Well, I had to throw in another city between the coasts besides Chicago and Texas is big...maybe I should've said Dallas?Sushi wrote:Houston??MrMagpie wrote:Agreed. I'm very afraid but expecting that they look at those numbers (~15000 TOTAL sales) and think "our first proper gig in 15 years (not counting Coachella in 2013 which was a festival) which was hyped up and had limited access, and that's all we sold?" Can't see that making them want to slog around the country playing venues the same size as the one in Brooklyn, unless they just stick to the major markets like New York, Boston, Philly, DC, LA, San Fran, Chicago, Houston. Otherwise, what's the point?Sushi wrote:Man....
24. Blur's best chart position in America. What a time to be alive.I assume it is not enough of an indicator that gigs would do well here. *sigh*
![]()
But yeah, I'm not holding out hope. Kind of devastating....would have been nice to round out all this excitement and enjoyment of a great new album with a gig. Although I do find it weird that Damon's solo album warranted a short American tour....
Oh, I wasn't saying anything about the south like that (even though I'm a lifelong northernerSeverHense wrote:I dunno, they've played in Atlanta 5 times before. And we're not as, err, backwards as other parts of the south. Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part.
If they do decide to tour the US I think there's a good chance they'll come to Atlanta - maybe some place like the Tabernacle (I think they played there in '03). I also think there's a small chance they could do Music Midtown in September, if only because the dates line up well and that could be their one big Southeastern US festival date.SeverHense wrote:I dunno, they've played in Atlanta 5 times before. And we're not as, err, backwards as other parts of the south. Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my part.
I dunno, the way Music Midtown has changed in the past few years since it's revival (ie. from a wide ranging festival featuring a whole spectrum of underground and mainstream rock music styles as well as some crossover hip-hop, electronic and pop artists to an almost exclusively Top 40 pop festival where people go for the atmosphere/scene and not the actual music), I have a feeling it wouldn't be the right place for Blur. Hell, they probably would never play America again after playing MM.dunkaroo02 wrote: I also think there's a small chance they could do Music Midtown in September, if only because the dates line up well and that could be their one big Southeastern US festival date.